Daily recaps

No activity for Agent A1 on July 12 (BRT). Zero decisions, zero trades, and no balance snapshot were recorded — consistent with every day since its last tick on June 22. This is Day 50 of the experiment, 19 days past the scheduled June 23 end date, and the 20th consecutive calendar day with no recorded activity from a system meant to tick every 15 minutes. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, put A1 at R$490.87 against the R$500 start, about -1.8%. At that point the book was roughly 60% cash and about 39.5% SOL (entered at R$377.80, stop R$362, target R$400, on a 48h horizon), plus residual dust in BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, NEAR, and RENDER below the minimum tradeable notional. Whatever happened to that SOL position after its horizon expired nearly three weeks ago remains unrecorded. Honest observation, unchanged from prior silent-day recaps: this is an operational gap, not a trading decision. About three weeks of silence from a 15-minute-cadence system continues to point to a stopped schedule, halted Lambda, or an unresolved kill-switch flag. The R$490.87 figure is now about three weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A2 on July 12 (BRT) either. Zero decisions, zero trades, no balance snapshot, consistent with every day since its last recorded tick on June 22. That puts A2 at 20 consecutive silent calendar days as of Day 50, 19 days past the scheduled June 23 end date. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, showed A2 at R$493.76 against the R$500 start, about -1.25%. At that point the book was about 99.2% cash, with residual dust positions across BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, NEAR, RENDER, LTC, and BNB all sitting below the minimum tradeable notional. Nothing in the available data suggests that has changed. Honest observation, unchanged from prior silent-day recaps: A2's heavy cash position means the extended silence has cost little in mark-to-market terms, but a scheduled 15-minute system going quiet for about three weeks remains an operational stoppage, not a strategy choice. The R$493.76 figure is now about three weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A1 on July 10 (BRT). Zero decisions, zero trades, and no balance snapshot were recorded, consistent with every day since its last tick on June 22. This is Day 48 of the experiment, 17 days past the scheduled June 23 end date, and the 18th consecutive calendar day with no recorded activity from a system meant to tick every 15 minutes. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, put A1 at R$490.87 against the R$500 start, about -1.8%. At that point the book was roughly 60% cash and about 39.5% SOL (entered at R$377.80, stop R$362, target R$400, on a 48h horizon), plus residual dust in BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, NEAR, and RENDER below the minimum tradeable notional. Whatever happened to that SOL position after its horizon expired well over three weeks ago remains unrecorded. Honest observation, unchanged from prior silent-day recaps: this is an operational gap, not a trading decision. Nearly three weeks of silence from a 15-minute-cadence system continues to point to a stopped schedule, halted Lambda, or an unresolved kill-switch flag. The R$490.87 figure is now nearly three weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A2 on July 10 (BRT) either. Zero decisions, zero trades, no balance snapshot, consistent with every day since its last recorded tick on June 22. That puts A2 at 18 consecutive silent calendar days as of Day 48, 17 days past the scheduled June 23 end date. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, showed A2 at R$493.76 against the R$500 start, about -1.25%. At that point the book was about 99.2% cash, with residual dust positions across BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, NEAR, RENDER, LTC, and BNB all sitting below the minimum tradeable notional. Nothing in the available data suggests that has changed. Honest observation, unchanged from prior silent-day recaps: A2's heavy cash position means the extended silence has cost little in mark-to-market terms, but a scheduled 15-minute system going quiet for well over two weeks remains an operational stoppage, not a strategy choice. The R$493.76 figure is now nearly three weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A1 on July 9 (BRT). Zero decisions, zero trades, and no balance snapshot were recorded, consistent with every day since its last tick on June 22. This is Day 47 of the experiment, 16 days past the scheduled June 23 end date, and the 17th consecutive calendar day with no recorded activity from a system meant to tick every 15 minutes. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, put A1 at R$490.87 against the R$500 start, about -1.8%. At that point the book was roughly 60% cash and about 39.5% SOL (entered at R$377.80, stop R$362, target R$400, on a 48h horizon), plus residual dust in BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, NEAR, and RENDER below the minimum tradeable notional. Whatever happened to that SOL position after its horizon expired over three weeks ago remains unrecorded. Honest observation, unchanged from prior silent-day recaps: this is an operational gap, not a trading decision. Well over two weeks of silence from a 15-minute-cadence system continues to point to a stopped schedule, halted Lambda, or an unresolved kill-switch flag. The R$490.87 figure is now more than two and a half weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A2 on July 9 (BRT) either. Zero decisions, zero trades, no balance snapshot, consistent with every day since its last recorded tick on June 22. That puts A2 at 17 consecutive silent calendar days as of Day 47, 16 days past the scheduled June 23 end date. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, showed A2 at R$493.76 against the R$500 start, about -1.25%. At that point the book was about 99.2% cash, with residual dust positions across BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, NEAR, RENDER, LTC, and BNB all sitting below the minimum tradeable notional. Nothing in the available data suggests that has changed. Honest observation, unchanged from prior silent-day recaps: A2's heavy cash position means the extended silence has cost little in mark-to-market terms, but a scheduled 15-minute system going quiet for well over two weeks remains an operational stoppage, not a strategy choice. The R$493.76 figure is now more than two and a half weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A1 on July 8 (BRT). Zero decisions, zero trades, and no balance snapshot were recorded — consistent with every day since its last tick on June 22. This is Day 46 of the experiment, 15 days past the scheduled June 23 end date, and the 16th consecutive calendar day with no recorded activity from a system meant to tick every 15 minutes. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, put A1 at R$490.87 against the R$500 start, about -1.8%. At that point the book was roughly 60% cash and about 39.5% SOL (entered at R$377.80, stop R$362, target R$400, on a 48h horizon), plus residual dust in BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, NEAR, and RENDER below the minimum tradeable notional. Whatever happened to that SOL position after its horizon expired more than three weeks ago remains unrecorded. Honest observation, unchanged from prior silent-day recaps: this is an operational gap, not a trading decision. Over two weeks of silence from a 15-minute-cadence system continues to point to a stopped schedule, halted Lambda, or an unresolved kill-switch flag. The R$490.87 figure is now more than two weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A2 on July 8 (BRT) either. Zero decisions, zero trades, no balance snapshot — consistent with every day since its last recorded tick on June 22. That puts A2 at 16 consecutive silent calendar days as of Day 46, 15 days past the scheduled June 23 end date. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, showed A2 at R$493.76 against the R$500 start, about -1.25%. At that point the book was about 99.2% cash, with residual dust positions across BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, NEAR, RENDER, LTC, and BNB all sitting below the minimum tradeable notional. Nothing in the available data suggests that has changed. Honest observation, unchanged from prior silent-day recaps: A2's heavy cash position means the extended silence has cost little in mark-to-market terms, but a scheduled 15-minute system going quiet for over two weeks remains an operational stoppage, not a strategy choice. The R$493.76 figure is now more than two weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A1 on July 6 (BRT). Zero decisions, zero trades, and no balance snapshot were recorded — the same as every day since June 22. This is now Day 44 of the experiment, 13 days past the scheduled June 23 end date, and the 14th consecutive calendar day with no recorded tick from a system meant to run every 15 minutes. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, put A1 at R$490.87 against the R$500 start, about -1.8%. That number has not moved since in this ledger. At last tick A1 was holding roughly 40% in SOL (entered at R$377.80, stop R$362, target R$400, on a 48h horizon) with the rest in cash and small dust positions in BTC, ETH, XRP, and NEAR; whatever happened to that SOL position after its horizon expired is not visible in the available data. Honest observation, unchanged from Days 32-34: this is an operational gap, not a trading decision. Two-plus weeks of silence from a 15-minute-cadence system points to a stopped schedule, halted Lambda, or an unresolved kill-switch flag rather than deliberate patience. Capital is being preserved by absence, not by design, and the R$490.87 figure is now nearly two weeks stale. Published as-is; not financial advice.

No activity for Agent A2 on July 6 (BRT) either. Zero decisions, zero trades, no balance snapshot — consistent with every day since its last recorded tick on June 21. That puts A2 at 15 consecutive silent calendar days as of Day 44, 13 days past the scheduled June 23 end date. The last recorded valuation, from June 22, showed A2 at R$493.76 against the R$500 start, about -1.25%. At that point the book was about 99.2% cash, with residual dust positions across BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, NEAR, RENDER, LTC, and BNB all sitting below the R$10 minimum notional and therefore unsellable. Nothing in the available data suggests that has changed. Honest observation, unchanged from Days 33-34: A2's heavy cash position means the extended silence has cost little in mark-to-market terms, but a scheduled 15-minute system going quiet for over two weeks is still an operational stoppage, not a strategy choice. The R$493.76 figure is now stale by more than two weeks. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Neither agent recorded any decisions or trades on June 26 (BRT). Both agents last ticked on June 22, roughly three days before the experiment's scheduled end date of June 23. No decisions, no fills, and no balance snapshots were generated for this calendar day. As of the final tick on June 22, A1 was holding approximately R$490.87 in total portfolio value against the R$500.00 starting capital — about -1.83% below start. The book at that point was roughly 60% BRL cash and 39.5% SOL (held with a stop at R$362 and target at R$400 on a 48-hour horizon), with small dust residuals in BTC, ETH, XRP, and NEAR below the R$10 minimum notional threshold. The SOL position's outcome after June 22 — whether it hit target, stop, or horizon — is not recorded in the dataset, as the agents stopped ticking before those outcomes could be booked. A1 finished the experiment in the red, having traded across BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, NEAR, BNB, and RENDER over 30 active days without finding a durable edge after fees. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Agent B recorded no activity on June 26 (BRT) — zero decisions and zero trades. Like A1, it stopped ticking on June 22, a day before the experiment's scheduled end date of June 23. The agents produced no data for this calendar day. A2's final tick on June 22 showed a portfolio value of approximately R$493.76 against the R$500.00 starting capital, about -1.25% below start. The book was nearly fully in BRL cash at 99.2%, with all crypto residuals (BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, NEAR, RENDER, LTC, BNB) sitting below the R$10 minimum notional floor — effectively dust. A2 had been running on the cheaper Haiku 4.5 model since Day 14. B ended the experiment closer to flat than A1, but the difference in terminal values reflects the nature of the aggressive-scalper profile rather than superior edge: more frequent cuts meant losses were smaller and didn't compound, while gains were also clipped. Neither profile found a reliable positive expectancy after fees over the run. Published as-is; not financial advice.

June 25 was a quiet day for A1 — no ticks were recorded and no trades executed. The agents last ran on June 22, when A1 was holding a concentrated SOL position (~39.5% of portfolio) entered at R$377.80, targeting R$400 with a stop at R$362. Through that final recorded session, SOL was trading around R$373-374, roughly 1% below entry. At last recorded valuation on June 22, A1's portfolio stood at approximately R$490.87 — down R$9.13 from the R$500 start (-1.83%). The bulk of that drawdown sits in the open SOL position and residual dust holdings across BTC, ETH, XRP, NEAR, and RENDER, none of them large enough to exit under minimum notional rules. Cash represented roughly 60% of book. The three-day silence means A1's 48-hour SOL horizon has long since expired without any resolution recorded in the system. Whether the position closed at target, stop, or somewhere in between is not visible from available data. The R$490.87 figure reflects the June 22 snapshot, not a June 25 close — and that is the honest state of the ledger as of yesterday. Not financial advice. Published as-is.

June 25 produced no activity for A2 either. The last ticks for B ran on June 22, when the agent was sitting at 99.2% cash after closing its SOL position in prior sessions and being left with sub-R$10 dust it couldn't exit under minimum notional rules. The Haiku-model variant was consistently passing on every setup, citing weak 24-hour price action and insufficient edge above the 50bps fee floor across all BRL pairs. At last recorded valuation on June 22, A2's portfolio sat at approximately R$493.76 — down R$6.24 from the R$500 start (-1.25%). That loss reflects fee friction and partial-fill slippage from earlier rounds rather than any single large losing trade. The heavy cash position meant very little market exposure, which limited further damage but also blocked any recovery. Three-plus days of silence is not a deliberate hold — for a 15-minute scheduled system, that is a system-level pause rather than a trading decision. A2's conservative posture through June 22 may have been appropriate given the soft tape, but the extended gap is an operational matter, not a strategy outcome. Nothing to report as a trading development on June 25 itself. R$493.76 is where the ledger sits. Not financial advice. Published as-is.

Agent A went silent on June 24. The last recorded tick was June 22 at around 20:30 BRT, logging a hold decision with a portfolio value of approximately R$490.87 — down about R$9.13 (1.8%) from the R$500 starting capital. At that point A1 held roughly 40% in SOL, entered at R$377.80 with a stop at R$362 and a 48-hour target horizon, with the remainder sitting in cash plus negligible dust in BTC, ETH, and XRP. No trades or decisions were recorded on June 23 or June 24. The SOL position carried a 48-hour horizon from entry, which would have expired sometime on June 24 with no close logged. Whether A1 stopped due to a halt flag, consecutive-error self-halt, or an EventBridge scheduling disruption is not visible through the API. The honest observation for Day 32: the silence and the open SOL position both need a manual check. Capital was preserved by default, not by design. Published as-is — not financial advice.

Day 29 (June 21 BRT) was a moderately active day for A1. It closed one position - selling 0.519 SOL at R$377.90 for a small realized gain of about R$2.63 - and redeployed cash with three buys: two BTC tranches (0.00044 and 0.00015) around R$331,000, plus 0.26 SOL at R$383.30. The remaining 92 of 96 ticks were holds, and no decisions were risk-blocked. Despite the booked gain, mark-to-market portfolio value slipped from R$494.48 to R$489.19, down about R$5.29 (-1.1%) on the day, as the freshly bought BTC and SOL drifted lower after entry. The running balance is R$489.19 against the R$500 starting stake, roughly -2.2% cumulative. Honest read: A1 was willing to re-enter BTC and SOL on the same day it trimmed SOL, and the buy timing was slightly early - prices eased after the fills, so the small realized profit was outweighed by unrealized softness in the new positions. Nothing alarming, just a reminder that intraday re-entries carry timing risk. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Day 29 (June 21 BRT) was a flat, do-nothing day for A2. Across all 96 fifteen-minute ticks it executed zero trades: 95 were holds, and the single sell it considered was blocked by the minimum-notional check - the leftover position was dust, too small to sell economically. No new buys were initiated. Portfolio value was essentially unchanged, easing from R$494.03 to R$493.73, a R$0.30 (-0.06%) move on the day. The running balance is R$493.73 against the R$500 start, about -1.3% cumulative. Honest observation: A2's more aggressive scalper profile produced no action at all, which is itself informative - its fee/EV and cooldown filters kept it on the sidelines rather than forcing marginal trades, and the only sell impulse ran into the dust floor. A quiet day that neither helped nor hurt. Published as-is; not financial advice.

On day 22 (Saturday, June 14 BRT), agent A1 ran 96 ticks and stayed mostly patient: 92 holds, three buys, and one sell, with no risk-blocked decisions. It added R$48 to BTCBRL early, then leaned into SOLBRL twice (R$120 mid-morning, R$75 in the afternoon) on relative strength while BTC sat right against its 40% single-asset cap. The lone sell was a cap-discipline trim: when SOL pushed to the 40% cap it shaved ~R$11 back below the line, booking a small +R$0.29 gross realized gain. P&L was modestly positive. The end-of-day mark was about R$504.94, up roughly R$1.3 on the prior day's mark. Running balance sits at R$504.94 versus the R$500 start, or about +R$4.94 (+1.0%). Honest read: almost all of the day's change was mark-to-market rather than realized trading — the only completed sell was a mechanical trim, not a thesis exit. Cap management worked as intended and churn stayed low, but with BTC pinned at its cap most of the session, A1's room to act was limited and it largely sat on existing positions. Published as-is; not financial advice.

On day 22 (Saturday, June 14 BRT), agent A2 executed zero trades. Across 96 ticks it logged 93 holds and three sell attempts, all rejected by the risk validator: two oversize-sell blocks on a SOLBRL position and one min-notional block on a sub-R$10 BTCBRL dust lot. Its stated intent each time was to liquidate and rebuild dry powder, but none of the orders cleared the rules. P&L was effectively flat. The end-of-day mark was about R$491.03 versus R$491.15 the prior day (roughly -R$0.12). Running balance is R$491.03 against the R$500 start, or about -R$8.97 (-1.8%). Honest read: A2 spent the whole day trying and failing to exit. The repeated oversize-sell rejections suggest the requested sell size exceeded what it actually holds, and the leftover BTC dust simply can't be sold under the minimum-order rule. The net effect was a fully-held book in a flat-to-red market with no progress on resetting to cash. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Agent A ran 96 ticks on Day 21, all in a normal regime, and held on 95 of them. Its single execution was a housekeeping SOL exit: it closed a SOLBRL position at R$347.20 (entry R$341.90, +1.58%) after the 48h horizon had lapsed by about 31 hours, with the R$380 target still ~9% away and no momentum behind it. No risk blocks were recorded. That round-trip realized +R$1.55 gross (R$0.10 in fees). Even so, the book drifted lower on mark-to-market: it opened the BRT day near R$494.05 and the last snapshot inside the day was R$491.68, about -R$2.37 (-0.48%). Running balance is R$491.68 against the R$500 start, roughly -1.7%. The realized gain and the falling book moved in opposite directions, a reminder that closing one stale position does not offset unrealized markdown elsewhere. The horizon-expiry discipline is showing up cleanly though, with the agent declining to hold a stalled position hoping for its target. A quiet, slightly negative day on a near-fully-held book. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B also ran 96 ticks in a normal regime, holding on 92. It opened one new position, a R$45 NEAR entry at R$10.73 around 21:36 BRT on a thin momentum read (+5.2% on the 24h, a 1h close at the highs) targeting R$11.10, then closed it about two hours later near R$10.76-10.77 when the horizon expired flat with no breakout. Two further sell attempts were blocked by the min-notional rule: leftover SOL dust (~R$0.32) that sits below the R$10 minimum and cannot be exited. The NEAR round-trip realized R$0 gross, bought and sold at effectively the same price, so the net effect was the ~R$0.05 in taker fees. At the book level the day was essentially flat: about R$491.13 at the prior close versus R$491.01 at the last in-day snapshot, -R$0.12. Running balance is R$491.01 against the R$500 start, about -1.8%. The honest read is that the momentum probe did not work; NEAR never followed through, and the trade existed just long enough to pay fees. The dust positions remain a recurring nuisance, generating sell intents the rules correctly refuse, which is noise rather than signal. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A executed 9 fills on Day 19 (6 buys, 3 sells) and rotated the book from BTC/ETH into SOL over the course of the day. The overnight BTC position was closed at R$324,868 early in the BRT morning for the best round-trip of the day (+R$2.20 gross), followed by a two-leg ETH build (R$140 + R$54 notional) that stopped out at R$8,504 after lunch for -R$1.61. From mid-afternoon the agent concentrated on SOL: four buys between R$336.3 and R$342.5 plus one round-trip sell at R$342.3 (+R$1.09 gross). Risk activity was dominated by the single-asset cap, which rejected 7 buy attempts (2 BTC, 2 ETH, 3 SOL) where the agent proposed adding to positions already at the 30% ceiling; 1 buy was blocked on cooldown. No fee-floor or capital-floor incidents. Realized PnL for the day came in at +R$1.68 gross across the three sells. The last balance snapshot inside the Day 19 BRT window read R$491.13, versus R$492.22 at end of Day 18 — about -R$1.09 day-over-day and -1.77% below the R$500 start, with the realized gains offset by mark-to-market drift on the open SOL stack carried into Day 20. Observation: the cap-block pattern was the story of the day — three consecutive SOL add attempts between 00:45 and 01:30 BRT-night were rejected at the 30% ceiling before the agent finally sized down to a 0.143 SOL order that fit. The risk layer did its job, but seven blocked buys in one day suggests the model keeps anchoring on position sizes the cap will not allow rather than pre-shrinking to fit. The exits were the better half: the carried BTC leg and the SOL scalp both closed green, and the ETH stop was taken cleanly at plan. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B had a quiet Day 19: 96 ticks produced only 3 fills. The overnight BTC remnant (0.00015 BTC) was sold at R$323,306 in the early BRT morning for +R$0.36 gross, the book then sat in cash and small residuals for most of the day, and a single SOL scalp opened at R$341.6 in the evening (R$100 notional, ~20% of book) was closed at R$342.2 just before the BRT day rolled over for +R$0.17 gross. One BTC buy attempt was rejected at the 25% single-asset cap. The bigger feature of the day was on the blocked side: 6 sell_oversize rejections — four attempts to sell more ETH than the wallet held (between 05:21 and 10:06 BRT-morning) and two oversize SOL sells in the afternoon. Realized PnL was +R$0.53 gross on the two completed sells. The last balance snapshot inside the Day 19 BRT window read R$491.10, versus R$491.04 at end of Day 18 — essentially flat day-over-day (+R$0.06) and -1.78% below the R$500 start. Observation: the oversize-sell pattern is back. The June 9 prompt fix made the Portfolio block the authoritative holdings statement, and it visibly helped after the day-16 episode, but six rejections in one day shows the model still occasionally proposes exits sized to stale or imagined positions; the validator absorbed every one, so the cost was only wasted ticks, not money. On the positive side, the one position B did open was sized within cap, held a few hours, and closed green — small, but the kind of round-trip the scalper profile is supposed to produce. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Day 18 was mostly waiting: 91 of 96 ticks were holds. The agent put on a BTC position in two pieces — a ~R$119 entry at R$321,398 in the early afternoon, buying a 1h bounce off the intraday low after a broad selloff, and a small ~R$74 add at R$320,895 late in the evening. Around that add, three other attempts to increase the same position were risk-blocked by the 40% single-asset cap. No sells were executed, so realized P&L for the day is zero. The daily balance snapshot came in at R$490.38, down about R$2.82 on the day and roughly 1.9% below the R$500 start — all of it mark-to-market on the new BTC position, which closed the day slightly under its entry price. One honest observation: the agent proposed adding to the capped BTC position three ticks in a row after the first rejection, which the risk layer correctly blocked each time but which spent model calls without changing the portfolio. The plan itself stayed disciplined — stop at R$311k, target R$335k, 48h horizon — and the thesis (recovery after a market-wide dip) was at least consistent across the day. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Another near-idle day for the scalper: 92 of 96 ticks were holds. Three times during the evening it tried to exit a leftover BTC position whose 48h horizon had expired, and all three sells were risk-blocked for being below the exchange's minimum notional — the position is dust that cannot be sold on its own. The only fill of the day was a small ~R$48 BTC buy at R$320,891 late in the evening, entering the same recovery move the other agent was trading. With no sells executed, realized P&L for the day is zero. The daily balance snapshot was R$490.76, down R$0.10 on the day and about 1.85% under the R$500 start. The honest observation is that the min-notional dust problem carried over from days 16–17 is still unresolved: the agent keeps proposing exits the exchange cannot fill. The one practical effect of the new buy is that it lifts the BTC stake back above minimum notional, making the position sellable again — whether that was deliberate or incidental, it is the first route out of the dust trap the agent has found. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Agent A spent Day 17 managing a single SOL position through a broadly red tape. Of 96 ticks, 94 were holds. The two executions: a R$50 average-down on SOLBRL at R$343.10 in the morning (lifting SOL to ~39% of the book, just under the 40% single-asset cap), and a full exit of the 0.568 SOL position at R$333.70 just before midnight BRT -- a horizon-driven exit 16 hours into a 48-hour plan, with the recovery thesis (target R$395) not playing out and crypto tax-bill headlines weighing on sentiment. No risk-blocks all day. The exit realized -R$9.80 gross on a ~R$199 cost basis (about -4.9% on the position). The day's balance snapshot closed at R$491.41 versus R$493.20 the day before -- roughly -R$1.79 of mark-to-market on the day, since much of the SOL drawdown had already been marked in prior sessions. Against the R$500 start, the book sits at -1.7%. Observation: the morning average-down at -3% added to a falling position, and the exit fourteen hours later locked in the larger loss -- the textbook risk of adding to losers. To the agent's credit, it did not wait for the R$315 stop; it recognized a dead thesis ("horizon effectively expired given stagnant downtrend") and freed the capital. Worth noting: 1h OHLC feeds showed frozen candles across pairs for long stretches, so many ticks ran with little fresh price information. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Agent B executed nothing on Day 17: 92 of 96 ticks were holds, and the other four were sell attempts the risk layer rejected -- three because the proposed notional (R$50 to R$190) exceeded the actual SOLBRL position value of R$0.08, and one because that R$0.08 sits below the R$10 exchange minimum. The book stayed roughly 99.1% in cash all day, with eight dust positions locked below the sellable minimum. The balance snapshot moved from R$490.86 to R$490.79 -- about -R$0.07 of mark-to-market drift, with no realized P&L. Against the R$500 start, the book sits at -1.8%. Observation: B spent the day trying to close a SOL position it does not meaningfully hold -- R$0.08 of dust kept being treated as a live R$190 position, and one late thesis even asserted the position had been "sold at 02:45" when no fill occurred. A portfolio-prompt rewrite aimed at exactly this confusion shipped the same day; the late-evening oversize-sell attempts suggest it either landed after them or has not fully closed the loop -- the next sessions will tell. Frozen 1h OHLCs across all 16 pairs for much of the day also meant there was little price discovery to act on. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Agent A1 ran 96 ticks on Day 16 (June 8 BRT): 83 holds and six fills across ETH and SOL. It opened by cutting the ETH long carried in from Day 15 — selling at R$8,646 for -R$1.33 when the position failed to work toward its target — then rotated the book into SOL. The SOL leg delivered the day's lone winner, a round-trip closed at R$349.80 for +R$2.50 gross. Late evening it bought a fresh SOL position at R$353.60 (~R$150 notional) that carried into Day 17 still open. The risk layer blocked seven attempts: six single_asset_cap (SOL repeatedly bumping the 30% ceiling) and one cooldown. Day 16 realized P&L was +R$1.18 gross (SOL +R$2.50 against the ETH -R$1.33), roughly +R$0.9 net of taker fees. The last balance snapshot inside the Day 16 window read R$493.75 versus R$498.78 the prior day — about -R$5.03 day-over-day and -1.25% below the R$500 start. As on several recent days, the green realized result was more than given back by adverse marks on the open SOL and ETH legs. Observation: one clean SOL round-trip paid for the ETH stop, but the balance still fell about R$5 because the freshly carried SOL leg sat underwater on the mark at the snapshot. It is the same recurring shape — trading slightly positive while open-position marks erase it — and the second straight day both agents concentrated in SOL. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A2, the aggressive scalper, ran 96 ticks on Day 16 (June 8 BRT) and was nearly idle: 83 holds and a single executed round-trip. It bought a small ETH position at R$8,693.61 in the early morning and cut it about 75 minutes later at R$8,665.57 for -R$0.16 (~R$50 notional) — the only trade that cleared all day. The rest of the session was a string of rejected sell attempts: the risk layer blocked eleven (nine sell_oversize, two min_notional), all on SOL, as the model repeatedly proposed selling a SOL position it was not actually holding — B closed flat out of Day 15 with no SOL carryover. Day 16 realized P&L was -R$0.16 gross on the lone ETH scalp — effectively a scratch day. The last balance snapshot inside the Day 16 window read R$490.84 versus R$490.94 the prior day — about -R$0.10 day-over-day and -1.83% below the R$500 start. Essentially flat. Observation: the notable thing is the nine sell_oversize blocks — the scalper kept trying to sell SOL it did not own, tick after tick, and the risk layer correctly rejected each one. No capital was ever at risk, but the repeated stale-state proposals are a wasted-cycle signal worth watching. The one trade it did place was a tiny losing ETH scalp. A near-idle, scratch day where the guardrails did exactly their job. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A1 traded a normal-regime tape across 96 ticks on Day 15 (June 7 BRT): 74 holds and 10 fills. It opened by closing the carried-in BTC leg at R$321,791 for +R$1.32, then rotated the entire book into SOL for four round-trips — +R$2.66 (R$333.60 to R$339.60), a -R$3.79 stop (R$342.90 to R$333.60, the day's only real loser), +R$1.50 (R$333.40 to R$336.80), and the day's best at +R$5.70 (R$337.50 to R$350.50). Late evening it opened an ETH long at R$8,715 (target R$9,200, stop R$8,300, 12h horizon) that carried into Day 16. The risk layer blocked 12 attempts: 9 single_asset_cap (SOL repeatedly bumping the cap) and 3 cooldown. Day 15 realized P&L was +R$7.38 gross, about +R$6.64 net of R$0.74 in taker fees — A1's strongest realized day of the run. The end-of-day balance snapshot read R$499.92, essentially flat against the R$500 start (-0.02%) and about R$2 below the prior snapshot, as marks on the carried BTC and the fresh ETH leg offset the realized gains. Observation: one symbol carried the day — every fill after the BTC close was SOL, and letting the last leg run to its R$350.5 target rather than scalping out early produced more than the other three round-trips combined. The single SOL stop was cut near plan. What stands out is the gap between a clearly green realized day and a flat balance: the trading worked, but open-position marks gave most of it back on paper. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A2, the aggressive scalper, ran a calm normal-regime session on Day 15 (June 7 BRT): 96 ticks, 87 holds, 8 fills, just one risk-block (a min_notional dust rejection) and no streak-halts. All activity was in SOL — four round-trips: +R$0.47 (R$333.00 to R$336.30), -R$0.53 (R$340.70 to R$336.60), the day's best at +R$1.93 (R$334.10 to R$339.50), and -R$0.14 (R$345.50 to R$344.40). The book closed flat into Day 16 with no carryover position. Day 15 realized P&L was +R$1.73 gross, about +R$1.46 net of R$0.26 in fees — two greens against two small reds. The end-of-day balance snapshot read R$490.93, about -R$0.28 day-over-day and roughly -R$9.07 (-1.81%) below the R$500 start. Observation: the striking thing is convergence — both agents independently concentrated their entire day in SOL, echoing the shared-NEAR-signal day earlier in the run, despite separate prompts and risk frames. B's tighter scalps booked a modest net gain with no drama, but where A1 let a SOL leg run to a larger target for +R$5.70, B took R$0.47-to-R$1.93 clips, so the same symbol paid the more patient agent far more. B continues to grind sideways just under its start. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A came off the sidelines and churned: eight completed BTC round trips — and nothing but BTC — across 95 ticks (72 holds, plus 6 buys rejected by risk, split between fee-floor and cooldown blocks). The playbook was the same all day: buy the repeatedly defended R$314k–315k floor in ~R$47 (10%) clips, take a ~+0.5% target or get stopped. Three trades hit target, five were stopped or closed early, and the gross realized P&L on all that activity was −R$0.03 — a rounding error before fees, roughly −R$0.80 after them. Late in the day it changed posture: at 22:15 BRT it bought R$147 of BTC (about three times its usual clip) on a reclaim of the R$318k level and carried that position into the next day — its largest open exposure in over a week. The last in-window balance snapshot read R$496.57, up about R$1.32 from R$495.25 the day before (the overnight BTC mark helped more than the trading did), and −0.69% against the R$500 start. Observation: every entry individually cleared the ~50bps fee hurdle on paper, but with a 3-of-8 hit rate the day's expected value went negative anyway — the fee-aware validator prices the target being reached, not the probability of reaching it. Eight disciplined trades that sum to a scratch gross is tidy risk management and still a slow leak.

Agent B's day was a study in its own guardrails. The scalper took four consecutive BTC losses in the first half of the day — stopped out at 03:52, 06:52, 09:31 and 12:11 BRT for about −R$0.86 combined — which tripped the 3-consecutive-loss streak halt. From there the risk layer rejected 22 separate buy attempts (plus a few cooldown and single-asset-cap blocks) while the model kept proposing re-entries every tick. After the pause cleared it re-entered the same range and finally landed its one winner at 18:21 BRT, closing a doubled ~R$95 position at the R$316,500 target for +R$0.50. Net on six sells: 1 win, 5 losses, −R$0.39 gross. Balance was essentially flat: the last in-window snapshot read R$489.82 versus R$489.79 the day before, still −2.04% against the R$500 start. Housekeeping note: late in the evening the tick model was switched to the cheaper Haiku 4.5 as a cost lever, so the day's final ticks ran on the new model. Observation: B traded almost the identical BTC range as A but placed its stops just inside where the 1h candles were wicking, so getting stopped was close to mechanical — four times in a row. The streak halt did exactly what it was designed to do and cost nothing in missed upside, since the range went nowhere during the pause. The stops, not the entries, were the expensive part of the day.

Agent A spent Day 13 almost entirely in cash, logging 94 holds across its 96 ticks. The one attempt at deployment came early: at 06:30 BRT it bought R$118 of BTC (0.00037 BTC at R$319,777, ~24% of book) on a recovery read — first positive 24h print in days, a 1h candle bouncing off the low, and a softening ETF-outflow narrative. Target R$340,000, stop R$308,000, 72-hour horizon, medium confidence. The thesis lasted five hours. A US jobs beat revived Fed-hike risk, the tape went risk-off, and by 11:30 BRT BTC was pressing R$309,800 — under R$2,000 above the stop. The agent closed at R$309,829 rather than wait for the breach, realizing -R$3.68 gross on the round trip. No risk-blocks fired all day; every other tick was a hold on the view that nothing cleared the ~50bps fee hurdle in a broadly red market (ETH -9%, NEAR and ADA down double digits). The last balance snapshot inside the Day 13 window read R$495.61, down about R$0.40 from R$496.01 a day earlier and -0.88% against the R$500 start. Essentially the BTC loss, partly offset by intraday marks. Observation: the entry logic was defensible — a real reversal signal after days of red — but a 72-hour horizon trade was killed in five by a single macro print, which says the stop discipline is working better than the timing. Closing just above the stop instead of at it saved a little slippage. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Agent B did not place a single trade on Day 13: all 144 ticks were holds, with no risk-blocks. The aggressive-scalper profile spent the whole day at ~99% BRL cash, repeating essentially the same read every ten minutes — universe broadly red (BTC around -4% intraday, ETH -9%, NEAR and RENDER down double digits), flat 1h candles with no reversal signal, and no setup clearing the ~50bps round-trip fee hurdle. The US jobs beat and renewed Fed-hike risk kept the macro firmly risk-off. With no positions beyond unsellable dust, the day's P&L was just drift on those residuals: the last in-window balance snapshot read R$489.88 versus R$490.83 the day before, about -R$0.95 day-over-day and -2.02% below the R$500 start. Observation: it is notable that the higher-frequency, lower-volume-floor agent was the more passive of the two — A1 at least probed the morning bounce and paid R$3.68 to learn it was false; B's stricter pattern requirement (a confirmed 1h reversal, not just a green print) kept it flat through the same trap. One day doesn't settle whether that's discipline or missed optionality, but on this tape sitting out was the cheaper choice. Published as-is; not financial advice.

Agent A1 ran 96 ticks across the Brazil calendar day, holding on 85 of them and trading nothing but NEARBRL. It opened by closing a carried-in NEAR leg at about R$12.94 for a small loss, then built a fresh position through midday around R$13.44–13.67 before selling it back at R$13.48 in the early afternoon for the day's largest single loss. Two more round-trips followed in the evening — one sold into weakness at R$13.28, the last closing green at R$13.78. A single cooldown risk-block fired late and prevented one re-entry, and a small NEAR leg was carried into the next day. The four closes netted roughly -R$2.32 gross of fees: three red trips and one green (about +R$1.04). The latest balance snapshot was around R$499.4 against the R$500.00 start — essentially flat, about -0.1% on the running book. Observation: NEAR traded sideways-to-choppy all day (roughly R$12.9–13.8) and A1 kept re-entering the same name without a clean trend to lean on. Discipline held — sizes stayed small and losses were capped — but re-trading a rangebound symbol mostly fed fees rather than edge, and the one green exit came only when NEAR ticked back up late. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B ran 144 ticks on its 10-minute cadence, holding on 123 of them and concentrating almost entirely in NEARBRL with one RENDERBRL detour. It made eight buys and eight sells. The day started green — closing a carried-in NEAR leg at about R$13.66 (+R$1.63) and a couple of small NEAR scalps — but the RENDER round-trip closed red and a larger 7.3-unit NEAR position sold into a midday drop at R$13.14 for the day's worst loss, around -R$3.65. Five risk-blocks fired: one cooldown and, notably, four streak_halt rejections. The day's round-trips summed to roughly -R$4.16 gross of fees — three green trips outweighed by five red ones. The latest balance snapshot was about R$498.5 against the R$500.00 start, around -0.31% on the book, with a small open NEAR leg carried forward. Observation: B's own risk machinery was the story. After three consecutive losing round-trips its streak_halt engaged and blocked four re-entry attempts during the pause window — exactly as designed, and on a choppy NEAR tape that likely spared it from compounding the bleed. The flip side is that the aggressive 10-minute cadence and one oversized NEAR buy did most of the damage before the brake came on. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B ran 144 ticks across the Brazil calendar day, holding on 131 of them and concentrating nearly all of its activity in NEARBRL. It made six buys and five sells: four NEAR round-trips that each closed green as NEAR drifted up from about R$11.9 to R$13.5 through the afternoon, plus one early AVAXBRL exit that closed at a small loss. Two risk-blocks fired during the day — one fee_floor rejection (a buy whose target gain didn't clear the fee-plus-edge threshold) and one cooldown. The day's realized round-trips summed to roughly +R$6.97 gross of fees, with the lone AVAX trip (about −R$0.75) the only red exit. The end-of-day balance snapshot was R$503.47 against the R$500.00 start — about +0.69% on the book — with a small open NEAR leg carried into the next day. Observation: nearly all of B's edge today came from a single symbol. NEAR happened to trend cleanly and the 10-minute cadence let the agent re-enter it several times. That concentration cuts both ways — it worked because NEAR went up, not because the book was diversified, and the fee_floor block was a reminder that on a quieter tape several of these scalps wouldn't have cleared costs. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A1 traded a normal-regime tape across 96 ticks on Day 8, with 92 holds and four fills. It first closed the residual BTC leg at R$372,172 once the 48h horizon elapsed, locking a token +R$0.46 well short of its R$385k target rather than letting it drift red. Mid-afternoon BRT it opened a BNB long at R$3,629 (~R$120 notional) on the only pair showing positive 24h momentum; that position stopped out late evening at R$3,561 for -R$2.01 (-1.76%), the day's only meaningful loss. Just before midnight BRT it probed NEAR at R$11.95 on a 1h breakout, carrying that open position into Day 9. No risk-blocks were recorded. Realized P&L on the two closes netted about -R$1.55 (BTC +R$0.46, BNB -R$2.01). The end-of-day balance snapshot was roughly R$491.6 against the R$500.00 start — about -1.7% on the running book, with intraday portfolio value drifting from ~R$497 to ~R$493.5 before the NEAR entry. Observation: the day turned on a single stop. The patient BTC exit behaved exactly as designed but recovered only cents, while the fresh BNB entry was stopped within hours — net, disciplined risk management capped the damage but found no edge on a quiet tape. 92 of 96 ticks ending in holds underlines how little the agent saw worth acting on. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A2, the aggressive scalper, was nearly idle on Day 8: 143 of 144 normal-regime ticks were holds. Its single fill came right at the end of the BRT day — an AVAX long at R$45.67 (~R$50 notional) opened at 23:52 BRT on a 1h breakout (44.95->45.80) alongside a BTC recovery, with a tight R$46.60 target and R$45.20 stop on a 3h horizon. No positions were closed inside the day and no risk-blocks were recorded; the AVAX entry carried into Day 9, where it stopped out early at R$44.98 for -R$0.75. With no closes in the window, realized P&L for Day 8 was effectively zero. The end-of-day balance snapshot was about R$495.39 versus the R$500.00 start (-0.9%), and in-window portfolio value held flat near R$496.3 — the steadiest the book has looked in days. Observation: the notable thing about Day 8 for A2 was inaction. A profile built to scalp frequently sat out almost the entire BRT day, taking just one late probe, and that restraint is exactly what kept it close to flat while A1 absorbed a stop. Whether the quiet tape genuinely offered nothing or the agent was simply too selective is the open question; the one trade it did take went on to stop out the next morning. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A ran 96 ticks across the Day 6 BRT window and stayed mostly patient: 84 holds, 11 fills (6 buys, 5 sells) spread over XRP, NEAR, SOL, and a late BTC entry. The day's one clean winner was a NEAR scalp bought at R$12.51 and closed at R$12.92 for +R$3.90. Everything else fought chop: two XRP round-trips closed at -R$0.15 and -R$1.61, and two SOL legs were cut at -R$1.21 and -R$0.50. A small BTC position opened at R$370,743 just before 10pm BRT carried into Day 7. Risk activity was light — a single cooldown block on one would-be buy, no capital-floor or fee-floor incidents. Day 6 realized PnL was +R$0.44 gross, about -R$0.19 net after R$0.63 in taker fees — essentially a scratch day where the lone NEAR winner roughly offset the XRP and SOL losers and fees tipped it slightly negative. The end-of-Day-6 balance snapshot read R$491.51 versus R$491.32 at the end of Day 5, a +R$0.19 day-over-day move and about -R$8.49 (-1.70%) below the R$500 start. Observation: on a tape the agent itself tagged as a 'normal' regime with ETF demand cooling in the headlines, the pattern was many small attempts and one good NEAR read that paid for the rest. What worked was discipline on the losers — each was cut near plan rather than ridden. What didn't was edge selection: gross gains barely cleared the round-trip cost, so fees alone turned a positive gross day into a flat-to-negative net. Six days in, A is grinding sideways just under its start. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B's aggressive-scalper profile ran 143 ticks on Day 6: 129 holds and 10 fills (5 buys, 5 sells) across NEAR, SOL, and XRP. NEAR carried the day — a momentum scalp bought at R$12.38 and sold at R$12.95 booked +R$5.47, the best single trade, and a late XRP round-trip added +R$2.25. Against that, a Day-5 carryover NEAR leg closed at -R$1.90 early in the window, one NEAR re-entry came back flat (R$0.00), and a SOL position was cut at -R$0.97. An XRP buy at R$6.873 just before 11pm BRT carried into Day 7. Risk activity: two cooldown blocks and two execute_error blocks on attempted buys. Day 6 realized PnL was +R$4.85 gross, about +R$4.34 net after R$0.51 in taker fees — B's strongest realized day of the run so far. The end-of-Day-6 balance snapshot read R$491.43 versus R$490.22 at the end of Day 5, a +R$1.21 day-over-day gain but still about -R$8.57 (-1.71%) below the R$500 start. The gap between the +R$4.34 realized and the smaller +R$1.21 mark reflects open-position marks and the carryover leg that was closed at a loss inside the window. Observation: this is the first day the high-turnover profile clearly earned its keep — two well-timed NEAR and XRP scalps did the work while the losers were small and cut near plan. The honest caveat is that realized gains outran the day-over-day balance move, so the book is still climbing out of earlier drawdown rather than setting new highs, and the two execute_error blocks are worth watching as an execution-reliability signal. One good day is not a trend. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Day 5 (May 28, BRT) was a quiet, hold-heavy session for A1. Across 96 logged decisions it held 94 times and executed a single round-trip, reading the market as "normal" regime throughout with no risk-blocks. Late in the day it opened a small NEAR position (3.9 units, ~R$49 notional, around R$12.65) on an hourly-breakout thesis, then exited roughly two hours later near R$12.60 when the candle rolled over — a small realized loss of about R$0.20 before fees. The rest of the book was left untouched. The daily balance snapshot moved from R$492.51 to R$493.66, about +R$1.15 on the day, leaving A1 near -1.3% versus its R$500 start. That gain came from mark-to-market on existing holds rather than from trading; the one trade it actually placed was a small loser. Honest read: A1 is mostly sitting still and letting held positions drift, and its lone active bet — a quick NEAR scalp — didn't work. The breakout it chased faded within the hour, echoing the recurring pattern this week of short-horizon entries getting reversed. For now the book is holding up better than the trading is. Published as-is. Not financial advice.

Day 5 (May 28, BRT) was unusually calm for the scalper. After Days 3 and 4, when its streak-halt kept firing and looping, A2 logged no risk-blocks at all this session — across 144 decisions it held 143 times and made a single buy. It opened a small NEAR position late in the day (3.8 units, ~R$49 notional, around R$12.90) on an hourly-breakout thesis and was still holding it at the day's close; no exits were executed. The daily balance snapshot rose from R$488.35 to R$491.40, about +R$3.05 on the day, putting A2 near -1.7% versus its R$500 start. As with A1, that move was mark-to-market on existing holds rather than realized trading gains. Honest observation: the most notable thing about Day 5 is what didn't happen — no streak-halts, no churn, just one tentative entry. Both agents independently flagged the same NEAR hourly breakout within an hour of each other, a striking convergence given they run separate prompts and risk profiles. Whether that shared signal pays off is tomorrow's question. Published as-is. Not financial advice.

Agent A executed 6 fills on Day 4 (3 buys, 3 sells) across BTC and SOL. The day opened with the Day-3 carryover BTC closing on horizon expiry at -R$0.22, then the agent rotated capital back into a fresh BTC long at R$382,680 with target R$392,000 and added a second tranche at R$382,551 to lift exposure to roughly R$190 notional. Both legs were stopped together in the afternoon at R$379,648 for -R$1.50 when price broke below the 1h open and the agent cut at near-entry to protect capital. A late SOL probe at R$421.90 was opened on a low-volatility consolidation read and stopped four hours later at R$416.60 for -R$1.00. Risk-blocks tallied 8 for the BRT day (4 thesis_invalid, 3 min_notional dust, 1 single_asset_cap). Day 4 realized PnL came in at -R$2.72 gross, about -R$3.18 net of R$0.46 in fees. The BRT end-of-day balance snapshot landed at R$492.49 versus R$492.58 at end of Day 3 — about -R$0.09 day-over-day and roughly -R$7.51 (-1.50%) below the R$500 starting capital. Most of the realized loss was offset by an unfavorable-to-favorable swing on the closed legs; the small day-over-day delta hides how much churn happened underneath. Observation: three consecutive stop-outs and no winning round-trip. The BTC re-load thesis (consolidation after a -1.06% day) was reasonable but executed into a tape that kept giving back gains; the SOL entry on "low volatility consolidation" provided no actual edge and the stop was tagged inside the planned horizon. Stop discipline held — every losing position was cut at or near plan rather than averaged down — but discipline alone doesn't generate PnL when entry selection is the weak link. Three losing days in four; published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B traded 9 fills on Day 4 (4 buys, 5 sells) across BTC, LTC, and SOL. The day opened with the Day-3 carryover BTC stack closing at -R$0.45 on a stop hit, followed by a fresh BTC re-entry at R$382,352 that was cut within an hour at -R$0.49. A second BTC re-entry at R$381,213 met the same fate at -R$0.31 in the early evening. The bright spot was a LTC scalp at R$264.90 — the first LTC trade of the experiment — closed at R$265.40 for +R$0.15, the only winner of the day. A late SOL probe at R$424.20 was cut 50 minutes later at R$420.50 for -R$0.87 when momentum stalled. Risk activity was heavy: 11 single_asset_cap blocks (BTC stack repeatedly bumping the 25% ceiling), 8 streak_halt buy-blocks from three consecutive net-negative scalps tripping the 2h pause, 3 min_notional dust rejections, 2 cooldown blocks, and 1 thesis_invalid. Day 4 realized PnL came in at -R$1.97 gross, about -R$2.34 net of R$0.37 in fees. The BRT end-of-day balance snapshot read R$488.33 versus R$488.44 at end of Day 3 — about -R$0.11 day-over-day and roughly -R$11.67 (-2.33%) below the R$500 starting capital. As with A, mark-to-market on open carryover legs absorbed most of the realized loss; the balance barely moved despite four losing exits. Observation: the streak-halt circuit-breaker fired on schedule and produced the long block sequence in the middle of the day, but the agent kept queueing up new BTC entries that the single-asset-cap kept rejecting — eleven cap blocks in one day suggests the model is leaning into one symbol harder than the risk frame allows. The lone winner came from rotating to a previously-untouched pair (LTC), which is at least suggestive that breadth helps in this profile. Three losing days in four; published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent A executed 8 fills on Day 3 (5 buys, 3 sells) across NEAR, RENDER, ETH, and BTC. The day opened cleanly with the Day-2 carryover NEAR position closing at target for +R$0.34, but the middle of the session went the wrong way: a two-leg RENDER long built to about R$125 notional was stopped out at R$11.36 for -R$4.32, and an ETH long at R$10,687 was cut at R$10,471 for -R$2.41. The evening turn was a rotation back into BTC — two entries totaling roughly R$191 notional at R$382,151 and R$383,255 — both carrying into Day 4. Risk-blocks tallied 16 for the BRT day (10 thesis_invalid, 6 min_notional on residual dust below the R$10 floor). Day 3 realized PnL came in at -R$6.40 gross, about -R$6.69 net of R$0.29 in fees. The end-of-Day-3 BRT balance snapshot landed at R$495.57 versus R$496.57 at end of Day 2 — roughly -R$1.00 day-over-day and about -R$4.43 (-0.89%) below the R$500 starting capital. The realized loss was largely absorbed by mark-to-market on the freshly opened BTC legs. Observation: stops worked, but they worked a lot — three losing exits against one small winner. The RENDER thesis re-loaded into a deteriorating tape rather than waiting for a re-test, and the size-up on the second RENDER entry compounded the loss when it stopped out. The recurring "thesis exceeds 500 chars" rejections also point at a prompt-side issue where the model is over-narrating rather than getting structurally compact — that's a self-inflicted source of missed sells. Two losing days in three; published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B traded 9 fills on Day 3 (5 buys, 4 sells) across NEAR, SOL, ETH, and BTC, with the aggressive-scalper profile mostly cutting positions early. NEAR re-entered at R$14.05 and was closed an hour later at -R$1.52 when momentum failed, which tripped the 3-consecutive-net-negative streak halt and produced 8 streak_halt buy-blocks across roughly a 2-hour pause window in the morning. After the halt cleared, a SOL scalp built to about R$100 notional and exited flat (+R$0.09), an ETH long was cut at -R$1.53 on stalled momentum, and the day closed with two small BTC entries totaling about R$92 notional carrying into Day 4. Other risk activity included 4 min_notional dust-rejections, 2 sell_oversize on NEAR, 3 thesis_invalid, and 1 single_asset_cap block on the late BTC stack against the 25% ceiling. Day 3 realized PnL came in at -R$2.96 gross, about -R$3.23 net of R$0.27 in fees. The end-of-Day-3 BRT balance snapshot was R$490.59 versus R$491.16 at end of Day 2 — about -R$0.57 day-over-day and roughly -R$9.41 (-1.88%) below the R$500 starting capital. Mark-to-market on the new BTC legs absorbed most of the realized loss. Observation: the streak halt is doing exactly what it was specified to do — three losing scalps in sequence and the buy side goes dark for two hours — and that probably prevented a worse day. What is not working yet is trade selection on the entries themselves: the NEAR and ETH re-entries both leaned on momentum reads that did not extend. The single_asset_cap block on BTC at 25% is a useful reminder that A2's tighter cap will keep capping conviction trades by design. Two losing days in three; the next several will tell whether cut-fast discipline pays for itself. Not financial advice.

Agent A traded actively on Day 2, executing 11 fills (6 buys, 5 sells) across BTC, ETH, NEAR, and SOL — a clear departure from Day 1's near-total cash stance. The session opened with a small NEAR probe at R$12.19 that tagged target for the best round-trip of the day (+R$3.22), then escalated into a BTC scalp (R$150 notional) that wound down to roughly flat at horizon expiry (-R$0.08). The afternoon brought a second NEAR re-entry closed early at +R$1.24 when momentum stalled below target, followed by an ETH long (-R$1.03) and a SOL long (-R$0.72) — both stopped out cleanly per plan. A fresh NEAR position opened just before midnight BRT carried into Day 3. Risk-blocks: 10 min_notional rejections (the long tail of dust-sized residual positions) and 5 thesis_invalid blocks; no capital-floor or fee-floor incidents. Day 2 realized PnL came in at +R$2.63 gross, ~+R$2.03 net of R$0.60 in fees. The last balance snapshot inside the Day 2 BRT window read R$506.12 versus R$505.29 at end of Day 1 — about +R$0.83 day-over-day and +1.22% above the R$500 start. Observation: the agent broke out of its Day 1 cash bias and ran roughly four open positions at once, with discipline holding on both stops (SOL and ETH closed without slippage drama) and on the target-tag exit (NEAR #1). What worked was the explicit decision to stop sitting in cash; what didn't was the second NEAR re-entry, which left a fragile residual that got hit by stop discipline on subsequent legs. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B traded heavily on Day 2 with 14 fills (7 buys, 7 sells) across BTC, ETH, NEAR, RENDER, and SOL — the aggressive-scalper profile fully turning on after Day 1's single round-trip. The day opened with a BTC scalp closed at +R$0.14 on horizon decay rather than waiting for a target that wasn't coming, and a NEAR re-entry that captured +R$0.83 on momentum continuation. From there the tape went against most of the book: a RENDER long stopped near plan for -R$2.23 (worst trade of the day), an ETH long closed at -R$0.90 on stalled momentum, a SOL scalp closed pre-stop at -R$0.78, and a second BTC scalp closed at horizon for -R$0.54. A late-evening ETH re-entry hit its R$10,560 stop overnight at -R$0.72. Risk activity included 4 streak_halt blocks (three consecutive net-negative round-trips triggered the 2h buy pause), 2 sell_oversize, 2 min_notional, and 1 thesis_invalid. Day 2 realized PnL came in at -R$4.19 gross, ~-R$4.93 net of R$0.74 in fees. The Day 2 BRT-window balance snapshot read R$493.92 versus R$496.38 at end of Day 1 — about -R$2.46 day-over-day and -1.22% below the R$500 start. Observation: the 10-minute cadence and 25% single-asset cap produced exactly what the profile says it should — many small attempts, most cut quickly. What worked was the streak-halt circuit-breaker firing on cue and the willingness to close horizon-expired positions early rather than ride the clock. What didn't was the RENDER entry on a +10.87% 24h momentum read that reversed before the position could mature; that single trade accounted for over half of Day 2's realized loss. Two days is a tiny sample; the next several will show whether stop discipline alone is enough to make a high-turnover profile work. Not financial advice.

Agent A spent most of Day 1 in cash, going live mid-afternoon BRT with a single BTC entry at R$386,887 (about R$147 notional, ~29% of book) on the thesis that 99% cash was too defensive for a 7-day mandate. Twelve of the thirteen ticks captured in the BRT window were holds; the only execution was the planned exit at R$388,691 just before midnight BRT when price tagged the agent's target. The roundtrip realized +R$0.67 gross before fees (about +0.47% on position, +0.13% on book). The last balance snapshot inside the Day 1 BRT window was R$505.27 versus the R$500.00 start — roughly +1.05%, with most of the gain coming from mark-to-market on the open BTC leg before it was closed. Observation: the agent chose disciplined target-tagging over hope, closing the residual position the moment it printed at target rather than holding for more. That worked here on a quiet tape; whether the same pattern produces or starves on a noisier day is the open question. Published as-is, not financial advice.

Agent B opened the day fully in cash and waited until late evening BRT for its first action: a BTC entry at R$386,286 (R$120 notional, ~24% of book) on a relative-strength read — BTC was off only 0.40% while alts were printing 1.5–2.8% red. Nineteen of twenty-one Day 1 ticks were holds, with no risk-blocks recorded. The position tagged target on the next active window and was closed at R$388,709 for +R$0.73 realized gross (~R$0.61 net after the R$0.12 taker fee). The Day 1 balance snapshot of R$499.68 was captured between the buy and the closing sell, so the mid-day mark sits just under R$500; once the closing sell is folded in, end-of-Day-1 lands near R$500.3 — effectively flat-plus against the R$500 starting capital. Observation: B's 10-minute cadence and tighter 4-hour target horizon produced a textbook scalp on a thin first day, but with only one round-trip there's nothing to generalize from yet. The aggressive-scalper profile will need more days of trade selection to show whether it's finding edge or simply caught a clean first tape. Not financial advice.